|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Mia is wife of Sheldon Solow (ownership of the flagship office tower 9 West 57th Street, and he owns and operates several other commercial and retail properties in New York City)
Although few, hedge funds, which do not look at the expenditure for a breathtaking view of Central Park, now dictate the trend in rents for office property in New York. "It is they who determine the direction of rents," says Alex Chudnoff, executive director with the distributor Cushman & Wakefield. Even if their number is actually low compared to the number of enterprises in the financial capital of the United States, hedge funds have large financial resources and are often eager to acquire the best surface to seduce their customers and their employees. While many hedge funds have chosen the town of Greenwich in the state of Connecticut, location for their headquarters - largely for tax reasons - many people have opted for a performance both in Greenwich and in New York. HedgeFund.net estimates, about 1,250 hedge funds are domiciled in Manhattan. A hedge fund typically leased the equivalent of 1,000 to 2,000 square feet of office space. Candidates often ask to enjoy a beautiful view of Central Park that often. In the first quarter of 2007, the average rent in Midtown Manhattan rose 27% year on year to reach 62.89 dollars per square foot (0.1 square meters). Some offices are rented now well beyond $ 100 a square foot, a price considered offensive even a year ago. "All rents are rising. Rents for Class B are now equivalent to the level of Class A and Class C those in the Class B," says Ben Friedland, at CB Richard Ellis . Cushman & Wakefield is to publish figures for the second quarter on Tuesday. The billionaire Sheldon Solow, owner of one of the most prestigious buildings in Manhattan, asks $ 200 per square foot to lease the top floor. "This is a very special place," said Christopher Kraus, director of estate agent Staubach, referring to the views offered by these offices above the 26th floor of Central Park. Alex Chudnoff, hedge funds can manage their rent at least two billion dollars in assets. MARBLE AND COLLECTIONS OF ART Since the early 2000s, the number of hedge funds is growing rapidly and some of them, their needs have exploded. Some funds have offices with an area exceeding 100,000 square feet (10,000 m²). Other fund management houses have applied for rental of offices in upscale neighborhoods as less Third Avenue, Lower Madison Avenue, Park Avenue South and Avenue of the Americas. "There used to be neighborhoods where hedge funds would never want to settle. Now they are ready to go anywhere," said Alex Chudnoff. Some spend a lot in quality materials and do not hesitate to consent to the construction of kitchens or private bathrooms. "These are places where the talent search. Hedge funds are willing to have a pleasant environment for their employees to work in good conditions," said Ben Friedland. "There are a lot of wood, lots of marble, lots of glass. Many private art collections are shown in these offices," he adds. All these areas must, however, offer less fun but necessary parts such as financial transactions in rooms open space, ventilation facilities for IT and local cooling. A hedge fund with about three billion dollars in assets under management spends on average about 5% of its turnover to the rent real estate, a share comparable to that granted by other companies to lease their offices, Christopher Kraus noted. The property owner Sam Zell, however, warns that any "hiccups" in the conditions for hedge funds could have painful consequences on the real estate market of Manhattan. An opinion not shared Chandman Sat, chief economist at research firm Reis estate, for whom the unquenchable thirst for Class A office and the shortage of this type of property should prevent the market from coughing. "We should have to deal with something a little more serious than a hiccup," he said. --- Collection Portrait of a City Summary Author: Jean-Louis Cohen Editorial --- Uniform architecture, the new exhibition of the Canadian Centre for Architecture (CCA) invites us to realize the tremendous impact that war has had on contemporary architecture and society. In approaching this new exhibition at the CCA, it is striking to see, in fact, architecture, images of destruction, like the photographs of August Sander Cologne in ruins. While cities are directly affected by the effects of war, architects become important players in the war effort, then taking the architecture of strategic value by participating as much to build than destroy. As such, the exhibition emphasizes the personality of the architect appears in the forms most diametrically opposed, Albert Speer, Hitler's favorite, to Szyman Surkis, the Polish architect deported to Auschwitz who worked in the office Architecture of the camp. Of course, the CCA exhibition tells us all the same architecture. But it is a particular architecture, the plants bombers and tanks, buildings of the military bureaucracy and concentration camps. As noted by the Commissioner, "is an architecture of the monotony and technology that will define the 50s and 60". For example, one of the rooms of the CCA is dedicated to four major projects of the time, who have distinguished themselves as much by their symbolic value because they illustrate a radical change of scale that will prevail after the war. Oak Ridge hosted 75,000 employees to build the atomic bomb. Auschwitz was built from a real development plan. The Pentagon stems from the desire to streamline the administration of war. And plant Peenemünde surprised by its striking modern architecture. Beyond architecture, the exhibition invites us to glimpse the amazing technological revolution, born of the war, which will profoundly change the way of seeing the architecture and which will enshrine the principles of modern architecture. Prefabrication is refined with the advent of artificial bridges and ports. Mobility housing is developed with the "barracks" military. New materials appear and you learn to use different ones already known. The war effort creates the principles of sustainable development before the letter. Even the media knows its infancy in the "situation rooms" staffs. As always, the exhibition is remarkably documented with drawings, photographs, posters, books, models, etc.. As a bonus, the National Film Board (NFB) offers a few period films, designed to engage Canadians about the war effort. A series of free lectures will be also given by the NFB on propaganda films. |
||||||||||||||||||||||