Ihor Kolomoyskyi ?

I have done this site especially for Ihor Kolomoyskyi
in order to visit thishousewillexist.org

Sorry for my poor english translation.



Ihor V. Kolomoyskyi (* February 13, 1964, Dnipropetrovsk) - businessman with the Ukrainian and Israeli citizenship [1], a member of the supervisory boards of Privatbank, oil mill "Naftokhimik Prykarpattya" and the oil company "Ukrnafta".

For educated engineer. He graduated from the Dnepropetrovsk Metallurgical Institute. Business deals since 1985. There is a board member of Privatbank, oil mill Naftokhimik mountains, as well as oil company Ukrnafta. In an interview with "ZN" Kolomoyskyi admitted that he personally owned 30% stake Privat. The total cost of enterprise group, whose major shareholders are also Gennadiy Bogolyubov and Alexei Martynov, experts estimate at $ 3.3 billion

IhorKolomoyskyi has media holdings "Glavred media", which includes diaries "newspaper in Kiev," "Nova", "Izvestiya in Ukraine", the socio-political weekly "Glavred" and "Profile". The holding also includes a TV news agency UNIAN and "City." In April 2010 ends on a deal to acquire 100% of media group "1 +1", which includes channels "1 +1" and "Cinema". In addition, he holds the fate of the holding in Central European Media (CME) and is a member of the Board of Directors of CME (founder and major shareholder Ronald Lauder) [2].

IhorKolomoyskyi is president of FC Dnipro (Dnipropetrovsk).

Married with two children. He lives mostly in Switzerland.

---

For the last presidential election nearly covered with IhorKolomoyskyi in trap deaf opposition. Even last summer, when the "Ukrainian Truth" within three months of attempting to write with co-owner of the group "Privat" purely political interview later and remained unpublished, tycoon insisted that the presidency Viktor Yanukovych - is the worse of two evils.

But history of the failure of privatization of Odessa Portside Plant radically changed his view. Last month campaign IhorKolomoyskyi actively supported the Party of Regions leader.

Yet now a businessman was left without any organized political lobby. And despite the rather negative attitude to it some influential figures surrounded by a new president, ahead of Kolomoyskyi waves rather mild opposition than integration into a new system of government.

And, obviously, during a small political respite IhorKolomoyskyi decided to take a strategic step. Last Friday, he became the second after oligarch Rinat Akhmetov, who resorted to public intervention in political life.

This leader of the group "Privat" has chosen a somewhat original way: he sent an appeal to the Constitutional Court about the need to revise the norms of the laws "On elections" and "On Elections of Deputies of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, local councils and village, township," which established party system of elections.

----
-> Created for Igor Kolomoyskyy, Ihor Kolomoyskyi

All three Ukrainian billionaires - Akhmetov, Pinchuk and Kolomoyskyi - almost peers. Most of them are public-law of ex-president. In the last year has become relatively affordable Rinat Akhmetov. 42-year old IhorKolomoyskyi - nayzakrytishyy higher caste character of Ukrainian business. Three months of negotiations of varying intensity prior consent, this interview at IhorValeryevich "ZN". After the interview, thinking we pretty ... and asked the leader of the group "Privat" after proofreading material send us a text on each page. Kolomoyskyi agreed without hesitation: "every word I can confirm and documents and witnesses" ...

IhorKolomoyskyi was born in Dnepropetrovsk. For educated engineer-metallurgist. He graduated from the Dnepropetrovsk Metallurgical Institute. Business deals since 1985. He is a member of the supervisory boards of major companies of the group "Privat", "MoskomprivatBank" NPK "Naftokhimik Prykarpattya", "Ukrnafta". In the control group are metallurgical and ferroalloy plants, monopolistic position on the Ukrainian market of manganese ore. In the asset packages five GOK. Group includes metaloferosplavne production in Russia and Romania. The total cost of enterprise groups, large shareholders of which are also Gennadiy Bogolyubov and Alexei Martynov, a very conservative estimate is estimated at half a billion dollars.

"Hard businessman who tries to detail to protect its interests. It is often inclined to view the rules during the game. Should therefore be treated with special attention to business with him. It is non-public, but mighty and powerful. " Such is the opinion of IhorKolomoyskyi competitors. We will add that neither the past nor in the new government Kolomoyskyi disregarded the dictates and authority.

When Victor Pinchuk is angry, then moves to a quiet, polite tone emphasized communication, from which the interlocutors in the ant's back. When angry Akhmetov, blacken his light gray eyes. What makes Kolomoyskyi when angry? Now we know - he agrees to an interview ...

- IhorV., to start or could you tell our readers what "group" Privat ". All say, "Private", "Private", a large financial-industrial groups with interests in the mass areas, with enormous capital. " Which group owns the property and in what areas are her main interests?

- I think "group" Privat "- a phantom, journalistic term. The reality - is the private, who are shareholders. Each of the major shareholders, except for banking, and other businesses. But all these businesses are not united among themselves, not associated economic and corporate responsibility. The fact that journalists are called group "Privat" - no holding and no corporation. You can not carry the analogy of "Interpipe" IUD or SCM.

-> Created for Igor Kolomoyskyy, Ihor Kolomoyskyi

- The person you have in Ukraine?

- I have about 30 percent of shares in "Privatbank". Another property I own indirectly through an unaffiliated company. Some of them are residents, some - not.

30 percent stake Privat has Gennadiy Bogolyubov. Among the owners of the bank is Alexei Martynov and management Privatbank.

In principle, between the shareholders 'privatization' is a conditional distribution, who are in charge of business applications. Martin's priority has been ferroalloys, Bogolyubov is president of Privat and this is his main activity, although there are many others. I'm doing more corporate things, oil trend, partly - steel.

- Some say that Tihipko left Privatbank of dowry, which exceeded the volume of formally proper. Is it?

- No, not so. If divorce Sergei Leonidovich the structure was a little later, but not at the stage of market development, it would get much more. But what has been done - something done, and today it is nothing to do with "privatization" is not. In some small objects, where we have a small package, but it is a bit more, we retained the interaction. But it does not scale enterprises, and of them do not even need to say.

- Came to us information that in Italy on birthdays daughters IhorSurkis dispute occurred between you and the favorites of the previous government. You said that the new government live well, and they argued that bad. What were the arguments of the parties?

- It was not a serious discussion, and participated in it, not me and my friend. And he really objected to their opponents, who argued that live in Ukraine is very bad, "Before we could not participate in the contest for" Kryvorizhstal ", and now we can." And he said that now people are sitting in prison, what he said, "is out of prison, and the forest with severed heads do not go" ...

- How do you rate the economic situation and its prospects?

- In all the figures look nice. But the standard of living is very low, and it makes me anxious. Although the reasons for the same price increases largely internal and external: more expensive energy, external market conditions unfavorable for metal products, through the budget seriously lacks. Although there are signs that the fall in metal prices due to seasonality and is transitory.

- How are the millionaires in Ukraine, we know about. And feel like billionaires and a multimillionaire? In that plan, for example, and are going, you invest?

- Much of my assets is directly or indirectly in Ukraine. Because I care about what happens and happens in the country. But I - optimist.

As for our investment plans, then, of course, if justice will prevail and NFZ back country, then we will participate in the competition for the acquisition of a majority of Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant. Pinchuk, the plant has acquired illegally, as it, by the way, back in 2003 warned: "The contest should be no special conditions. Transparent and clear. "

I think that we will participate in some kind of consortium or pool with the acquisition of "Krivorozhstal". As for other objects, the present privatization process slowed down considerably. I think that Valentina Semeniuk still need to understand that the legacy she left Mr. Chechetov, State Property Fund to list in the order and a clear privatization program. And if the program will be interesting objects for us, we will take part in competitions. Although today we still need to work on laying down in the existing enterprises.

- For example?

On petrol, gas and oil

- I owned a stake of "Ukrnafta". But under the influence and control of the so-called group "Privat" are more than 40 percent of the company. Just two years ago by the shareholders "Ukrnafta" it was decided to build a vertically integrated company. But a number of subjective and objective reasons, today this process is stalled. And despite the fact that recently a meeting in "Ukrnefti" was conducted and we found agreement with the new leadership "Naftogaz Ukraine", we have not produced an effective and coordinated system of interaction with the construction of age.

- You have formed relations with the new chairman of the supervisory board "Ukrnafta", the first assistant to President Alexander Tretyakov?

- We have seen with Mr Tretyakov only once, several years ago. And lately we communicate only by phone. You know that the phone does not build relationships.

- When Alexander Tretyakov said that one gas station "Ukrnafta" buys more than one million, Alexander Y. povidryvaty promised by a head. But today all the heads of purpose, meeting place and decided to spend over $ 500 million. purchase refills. How did you agree?

- Last refueling "Ukrnafta" purchased in 2004. And the gas station, "Ukrnafta" bought at auction in May and June this year, not yet paid: on some petrol stations do not permit of the Antimonopoly Committee and in other cases, the government limited to the amounts allocated to the acquisition. I think whether to expand the network of filling stations "Ukrnafta" will discuss at a meeting of shareholders in September, where he will make a final decision.

-> Created for Igor Kolomoyskyy, Ihor Kolomoyskyi

- Alexander Yaroslavsky has sold its 10 percent package "Ukrnafta" you. But it turned out that this package was an option and Pinchuk. As you zalahodyly zalahodyly and whether this situation?

- We have some papers signed on this occasion with Pinchuk. But they signed when his father was president. These papers have considered, and I do not even know at what level ...

- What, from your point of view, serves as the main cause of increasing gasoline prices and what is your price forecast?

- The main reason - increased market prices for oil. And while oil prices stay at current levels or increase the world, the price of petrol in Ukraine will fall. And may rise.

- To what extent?

- I do not exclude that the price may rise to five USD per liter.

- For what period?

- Peak sales usually falls on July-August and October. If we survive September and October and up to five USD over this period, price is not crawled, then at the end, it may be slightly reduced. Everything will depend on oil prices on world markets, and whether the price of oil will form the Russian suppliers.

Also today, Ukraine has a shortage of refining capacity: some closed for a long reconstruction, someone - at prevention. I have a fear that rising prices could also coincide with some artificial shortage of gasoline (call it so). But hopefully that will not.

- If Russia, which is likely to happen and, raise gas prices, do we need in Ukraine to close steel plants?

- Metallurgical - no, but the chemical, nitrogen, which in Ukraine six, it is likely will have to temporarily close.

- In your partners are part of "Dniproazot" that they will do in this case?

- Then I'll have to rebuild the company, or create on this new platform. Today the price of gas is around 70-75 dollars. per thousand cubic meters. If the price is raised to 150, which is going on conversation, "Dniproazot" can not be not only cost effective, and even work "to zero." I think this fate befall "Cherkasyazot" Severodonetsk, Gorlovka, Rivne and port.

- Do you plan to you and your partners to participate in the tender for construction of a new oil refinery, and as President and Prime Minister stated that it will build?

- I'm not sure that this construction will take place. Most likely, we will participate in this tender. Even when the plant actually build.

On the threat, and oblenergo budonivky

- We know that you three addresses in Ukraine - the Prosecutor General, Ministry of Interior and Security Service - have sent letters that Constantine Grigorishin and Poroshenko you supposedly reketyruyut. What is the subject of controversy and whether it reacted in some way our law enforcement agencies on your list?

- I know that the authorities are interested in this information, and the Prosecutor General's Office conducts peredslidchi action. Personally, with Peter Poroshenko I did not have any contacts. Just it relied Konstantin Grigorishin, describing the actions which will be taken against me. Grigorishin said that Poroshenko - his partner "50 50", and told me what earthly punishment threaten me, I will not support the issue Grigorishin capture works. Indirectly, the attitude Poroshenko this process I can judge from the fact that virtually all of the action plan set out Grigorishin I was done. But on the plan some of those who passed information to me and told Poroshenko.

- There is evidence that you and your partners have purchased Konstantin Grigorishin half of its package of eight works. Besides, you've got half the package, which includes former partners Grigorishin. Therefore, you should be formed at each regional energy companies package up to 40 percent of shares. Is it?

- I'll try to briefly tell the story of acquiring holdings electricity distributors, the more that it is largely determined my current situation, in particular caused me to address those threats, I talked about above.

So. I have purchased in Grigorishin 50 percent of its assets in eight energy companies, "Dniprooblenergo", "Zaporizhzhyaoblenehro", "Poltava", "Sumyoblenergo", "Chernigivoblenergo", "Lvivoblenergo", "Ternopiloblenergo" and "Prykarpattyaoblenergo." The first document we signed late last September. The first round of presidential elections was still half a month. I understand that Konstantin Grigorishin wanted "inshurens" - strahovochku a possible victory of Yanukovich. In mid-October, I gave him a deposit, which he, as far as I know, used to support the opposition and all told, he gave the revolution its money. Although, as it turns out in fact, the money was mine. They say Grygoryshyn provided the opposition in support of either 15 or 16 million dollars. So, 12 of them were mine. So let the great revolutionary budonivku he not trying: it is not clear that more revolutionary.

But we do not know. The deal was completed in late November. As a result, I purchased 50 percent of those companies which, in turn, owns 40 percent of the mentioned works. Understanding is also assumed that we must buy from the former partners Grigorishin ...

-> Created for Igor Kolomoyskyy, Ihor Kolomoyskyi

- Surkis and Medvedchuk?

- ... Yes, those former partners Grigorishin 30 percent oblenergo shares they own. And then work together to create a normal utilities. We planned to make the company public. The fact that regional energy companies do not give a high operating profit - they kapitalizatsiyna high cost. But if there is stability and conditions for normal operation, this company can be costly in the market, and this makes it possible to increase the value of shares you owned.

Up to 5 December - the date recognized by the Supreme Court invalidated the second round - Mr Grygoryshyn normally treated repurchase plans in the former partners of their shares. But after the victory of Viktor Yushchenko became the all clear and defined, the position Grigorishin somewhat changed, and he just said that now there is no need to buy, because now we can all pick up for free.

On this basis we have and there was a conflict. I said that we have nobody to fight not going and no one did not intend to take. As a result, he warned me: "Then you might have difficulties." In February, he tried to capture the "Poltava" and "Prykarpattyaoblenergo." In early March I made a statement on "1 +1", which is unacceptable things and Grigorishin may not be cited as the sole owner and dispose of its assets for the 40 per cent works. After all, half of them package already belonged to me. This situation is not solved until now, and I think that one could not be resolved because it has taken action against me, which went far beyond the commercial relationship.

- What was the threat addressed to you?

- The threat was this: if I will give him power of attorney for shareholders in regional energy companies, it will be me against fabricated criminal cases and I will have too much trouble.

- By the way, the old regime against you violated a criminal case over an attempt to counsel Grigorishin Constantine, who had already parted with Surkis and Medvedchuk and became a partner of Viktor Pinchuk. Incidentally, before opening the case I personally held in the hands of the lawyer's request to Prosecutor General's Office Grigorishin that you threatened him. Then this lawyer suffered serious stab wounds, and accordingly prosecuted. As far as I know, so she does not over. Is it true that now is an attempt resuscitation of a criminal case, and how is it that hit the person, which you were threatened?

- What can you think relations between the businessman and lawyer who serves another businessman? Advocate - a singer, as an accountant, a manager. It is beyond the line of corporate conflict. Therefore any relationship between a businessman and lawyer of a competitor can not be. Moreover - threats. The lawyer, who you say, worked in Pinchuk and Grigorishin. I think this whole business thoroughly developed this procedure and allowed it to move. But even the political regime that they could not make a criminal case against me, came only "charges". However, I do not know if it was all because I have a paper, which says that opening a criminal case denied for lack of corpus delicti. Today was another attempt to send a criminal case opened into the attack on the lawyer directly against me. But after my letter to the prosecutor's office, I hope, will be objectively investigated and bear responsibility by those who from the very beginning was thought to be evil. Attempt Resuscitation personal matters included in the scenario that I described Grygoryshyn March 5. All points of the plan implemented in May, June, July, so I have no doubt who is behind this. Those people whom he named me as their partners - namely, Petro Poroshenko, and the organization behind all this. I do not think the commission to participate in shareholder meetings worth following methods both for the Grigorishin, and for those who, he said, are its partners.

On the "gingerbread" in the fight for NFZ

- What do you think has ended saga of the Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant, and whether it is possible to objectively resolve this dispute in a situation where everything depends on the courts, and courts in commercial pluralism can be engaged by both sides?

- I would not like to judge about bribe the courts or not bribe. I can competently judge that in 2003 held a competition to acquire a controlling NFZ, as then conducted business activities in the enterprise. And my knowledge gives me reason to believe in the triumph of justice, namely - the return of 50 + one share of the state as illegally acquired by a consortium of his time "Dnepr", represented by Pinchuk.

We understand that before he was able to put pressure on the State Property Fund, on the courts. By the way, I do not understand why in light of what is happening, do not ask a few questions to Mr. Chechetov, former head of State Property: who phoned him and what instructions he was given? Curious in it, especially those formed as the conditions of competition, what were his actions to implement the directives, decisions and rulings of the courts came to him, why he threw them in the bin? I remember in 2003 he said that "someone knows how to play chess, while others can not." So here, for everything in life has ever meet. And for the "Uhi! Uhi! "Too. I understand that Mr. Chechetov person was forced, I understand, of which high offices he called. But always in a man who has courage is an opportunity to resign rather than cling to a chair and carry out criminal orders.

-> Created for Igor Kolomoyskyy, Ihor Kolomoyskyi

- Do you intend to buy shares in the NFZ and Scheholevskoho Dementiyenka - junior partners Pinchuk?

- I'm not sure that they are not related to the general stake.

- Given that today is the "Alpha-Invest", they probably can not be Pinchuk ...

- In the NFZ, as you know, in general very complicated history with the registrar. Despite the decision by the Securities Commission, "Alfa-Invest" continues to exist as a strange illegal entity. This recorder was appointed assembly, who then courts found illegitimate. So I do not know what stocks to Pinchuk, who - in Dementiyenka. Generally not known, the NFZ has to Viktor Pinchuk, in addition to the package 50 plus one share, resulting in illegal competition in 2003. They say he is still 23 percent, and can, in fact 10? Who knows.

- Why do you care about that package Nikopol back country? Why for example Abramov and Vekselberg would not buy a plant in Pinchuk?

- Firstly, we never bought rotten property. None. Secondly, I think its time Pinchuk deceived us when he went on a privatization competition, prepared exclusively for the condition itself. As a result, a 50 plus one share he bought for $ 80 million. (410 mln.), While on a transparent tender price would come down at that point to a billion. By the way, Abramov and Vekselberg Pinchuk suggested we buy all available shares in the Nikopol Ferroalloy him - more than 70 percent. But we refused. We do not want to buy him anything, it is our principled position.

- But you met with Abramov? Why?

- We tried to convince him that such a big businessman, who owns a public company "Evrazholding" unbecoming to Tukhlya purchase because it will lead to unnecessary scandals, including international. He did not listen to warnings. As a result of bad articles have appeared in New York Times and Wall Street Journal. In addition, it is questionable financing the privatization of "Krivorozhstal". But I, for example, is not clear why Abramov for $ 380 million. buys a package of NFZ in Pinchuk, if after the return of the package the state could buy it in a clean competition in almost the same money?

- Maybe he is afraid that you arrange with Tymoshenko about the competition and this time they will be formed under the "Private"?

- Privatbank never participate in contests with special conditions. We have always been supporters of that competition should be transparent and who paid more, the winner. We defend this view today.

- It is known that there are some papers signed between you and Konstantin Grigorishin on the fate of Nikopol Ferroalloy. What kind of documents and when they were signed?

- Aggravation of the process around the Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant began not today, and in December last year. There is a paper signed by Grigorishin, Scheholevskym and Dementiyenkom - on the one hand and me - on the other hand, the acquisition of corporate control of the NFZ. This paper is called agreement. But later, when I announced Grygoryshyn as needed to pay various officials who support it, and that the plant will need to buy Pinchuk, not the State Property Fund - agreement ceased to operate. We fell out and ceased to cooperate in this matter.

- IhorV., there is expert opinion according to which Poroshenko in the NFZ helps Pinchuk, and Yulia Tymoshenko - you. How do you comment on that?

- All over the press, judging by the publications, it is known that Poroshenko supports Grigorishin, but I know the situation inside. Remember, you asked questions about the paper signed between me and Grigorishin? So, according to him, controlling the Nikopol Ferroalloy had to be returned to the state. And buy it we had to public tender. But then the situation changed and Grigorishin said we should buy a plant in Pinchuk, not the state, and for it to Pinchuk Poroshenko ... Well, in general, they have there is some agreement. Then I did not know about these arrangements, I reported on them. But lately become the property of the public information that will be purchased when Nikopol in Pinchuk, not state, Pinchuk for it to share with Poroshenko channels. In March of this was discussed. We participate in this oborudtsi refused, saying that the plant will buy in the state. Against this background, there was a conflict, after a rushed search Grygoryshyn Abramov and Vekselberg. Maybe he will find someone else. It is clear from those who will plant for two billion USD - the state or Pinchuk, dependent, or reach the people behind Grigorishin, additional "carrots." From this I Grigorishin and did not hide. Moreover, trying to conceal Grygoryshyn not called and the amount which should reach for labor to those who help keep Pinchuk entitled to controlling Nikopol. We were asked to pay a tidy sum, which caused our failure and lack of understanding: from which a good miracles?

- In the lobby plitkuyut that comes to $ 50 million?

- Yes. About 50 million.

- How are you, in case the tender, ready to pack for Nikopol in 50 plus one share?

- If competition was today, I think, the price would reach 300 million and if the competition will be held tomorrow and it will auction the fight, I think, the price will increase to 400 million: excitement, auction, blood plays ... Someone walks into a casino, and some auctions on the purchase of Nikopol Ferroalloy.

About Mining, debt and "Krivorozhstal"

- In turn, Pinchuk and you can be claimed: for example, you have washed away his shares in Marhantsevskomu and Ordzhonikidze Mining. How did it happen?

- If Pinchuk had claimed, he would have expressed them. I know that at one time two 25-packs of Interest Mining acquired a kind of American company "Bloomberg." But then the company does not appear in the shareholders' meeting, did not participate in the additional issue, subscription and as a result of her bags was blurred. In the above you GOK we have influence but not control, and even more - the predominant package. If Mr. Pinchuk says that the company "Bloomberg" and he - it's one person, we will probably admit there was an injustice of his actions. We are ready with him to discuss the matter as far as our influence and competence in these enterprises. But he himself does not identify with the firm "Bloomberg."

-> Created for Igor Kolomoyskyy, Ihor Kolomoyskyi

- Again, with Viktor Mikhailovich you clash on KZHRK - "Kryvbasrudi." Claims that you drove Management Pinchuk and management put "Private"?

- Pinchuk temporarily managed the enterprise in orphan period. Control of management, he won again, thanks to his association with the State Property Fund. But when privatization is over "Ukrrudprom" and company "Solayn" became a full-fledged and full owner KZHRK - it replaces the management. Today there are normal professional people and people "Interpipe" expelled from there.

- Hard. Another question from the scope of Mining. In October 2001, you have some confusion with the former owner of the Southern Mining. In particular, the acquisition of the plant in the company of Yulia Tymoshenko seller was underpaid 30-35 million dollars with 50. They say that after the change of power questions that you were in the previous owner YUGOK was removed because the money that was lacking was paid ...

- If the shares sold YUGOK and Julia, then selling it not us, and Vadim Novinsky. Their relationship we have, in principle, do not apply. I do not deny that his time in the Southern Mining we had contact with Vadim Novinsky: each of us tried to put on your plant management. But we sat down, agreed and then our business relationship grew into a great friendship. And in his relations with Yulia Vladimirovna or not with Yulia Vladimirovna I did not initiate. When a person wants something to tell - it will tell you not want to - do not tell. We Tymoshenko's nothing ever bought were not from one another in debt. At the same YUGOK all perturbations occurred in October 2001 and from 2002 there normally coexist and Kolomoyskyi and Novinsky, and other shareholders. The company is working properly.

- Today, Alisher Usmanov raised the issue of a "Eurasian companies" - Mining Association of Ukraine, Russia and Kazakhstan. What do you think of the idea itself, or discuss it with you or come YUGOK in this interstate association?

- On behalf YUGOK all contacts with Mr Usmanov leads Vadim Novinsky. The question of a "Eurasian companies" we did not discuss the subject. I can not state categorically that - good idea or bad. Probably should ask the author of: pluses and minuses that he sees it. I, for example, monopolizing at least what I see only disadvantages.

- What kind of partners you take in the pool in the struggle for "Kryvorizhstal"?

- We do not know with whom to go to the competition, as we go, but that will go - sure.

- Does your partner to be a pool of Kazakh Alexander Mashkevich multimillionaire?

- Do not exclude. I know that we came out with such an offer, but negotiations have not yet spent.

- Can you, based on their sources to confirm the information that in Sardinia, in a hotel, negotiations took place between Abramov, Pinchuk and Akhmetov Vekselberg to create an alternative future for the pool competition on "Kryvorizhstal"?

- As far as I know, Akhmetov was not there. And you called businessmen plus Grygoryshyn actually met in Sardinia. And according to my data, discussed during these negotiations was particular about the "Kryvorizhstal".

- Prime Minister announced that the competition for "Kryvorizhstal" to hold an open auction in increments of one percent. Do you think if the government will defend this method of competition?

- Given that there are rules that have developed over the years, I find it difficult to talk about organizational matters tender. I do not know whether the prime of their change, or have time to do it. But regardless of technology competition, if there will be no additional conditions, if no one can look in the package competitor and give five dollars more, then everything will be fine: who gave more, the winner.

And if we can still hold an auction - great. And the move could be one percent and five. Zberemosya all and will walk.

On the "1 +1"

- In case of victory in the battle for Pinchuk ferroalloy, some channels will reach its lobbyists. And that "carrots" will reach someone who will help return the plant to the state and then make controlling NFZ a new competition? 40 percent of "1 +1" you buy for Tymoshenko?

- I have to question whether you feel the difference between the two situations? Someone help Pinchuk realize $ 380 million for its rotten property, resulting in the state receives no money for a controlling stake, but this one gets channels. Here is the logic.

A second situation is completely beyond logic. We - the business and why do we need for the return of state-Ms-s package, once bought on the illegal auction at a lower price Pinchuk, pay someone a bribe in the form of 40 percent of "1 +1"? By the way, the cost of 40 percent of the feed package in the market is estimated at $ 100 million. You want to say we are for that state something back, someone willing to donate 100 million? Where is the healthy chain meditation?

- We know that "Private" is almost always worked without a political roof, but it acted cynically, wisely and boldly. So in this situation: you are interested in a package that went to state. First, to punish Pinchuk. Second, get the opportunity to tender to purchase this package. Thirdly, be able to receive dividends from the already existing minority stake NFZ. Fourth, sell your ore plant that would not buy Pinchuk.

-> Created for Igor Kolomoyskyy, Ihor Kolomoyskyi

- Let's start at the end of the ore. We do not need to sell Nikopol Ferroalloy ore. Thus, in 2003 refused Pinchuk we buy it, leaving it closed some production facilities to those enterprises where it has traditionally taken it before. And in order to resume production today is the necessary investment that far exceeds the money previously spent on stopping the production. So for today and the amount of ore that produced Ordzhonikidze and Manganese, fully realized, and the excess ore for Nikopol we have not. So if we, in the case of passing a number of procedures and competition, we will host plant, to be pretty to think about how to reallocate the commodity flows, as ore supply NFZ.

Also subject I would answer you on all other questions, but I want to say I have no doubt the transparency of future competition. We do not intend to buy and give to someone "1 +1", because the state has regained their property.

As for punishment Pinchuk, then he will do it. 2003, we warned him: "Life - a supermarket, take what you want, but the ticket office - in front."

- Why did you buy the "1 +1"? How real this agreement and how to treat her American partners, because as we know, from speaking of the President of the American founders feed your potential partners are not found delight about the "neighborhood" with you?

- I do not know whom to negotiate Americans. We have a seller - is Fuksman Boris and Alexander Rodnyansky. We have a buyer - a company affiliated with businessman IhorKolomoyskyi. We conducted the negotiations. The negotiations are complex, burdened with lots of formalities, as is the American co-owner of the right "wedding night" on a purchase. Therefore, we are negotiating with the Americans who put their conditions and requirements. But today in our hands is the consent of American co-founder of "1 +1" on the transaction. However Lauder representatives were asked about the restructuring of the company: to be aligned economic and formal relationships that existed in them from Fuksman and Rodnyansky. As far as I am informed, now overcome all the formalities and the agreement given the "green light". Now the only question of time that will go to the formalization of our relationship with Rodnyansky and Fuksman. In parallel, we must fulfill those conditions that put the Americans. But these conditions are identified, recorded and they do not require additional acceptance.

- Some of Viktor Yushchenko's entourage tried to dissuade you from buying "1 +1"?

- With me on this occasion spoke only presidential aide Alexander Tretyakov. In that conversation there was no threats or harsh warnings. There was only a phrase like: "Why do you need it, you are a businessman, you will not engage in politics" ... But we believe this business and no politics here. If we offered to buy a TV for the old regime, we never did not like. Because it would not be business as a means of influence, not ours, and political, and buy channel then meant to get rid of a quiet life. I do not want to in case of a critical journalistic material I phoned home one night and screamed into the phone: "You there - crazy!"

I think when the government declares freedom of speech and defend a range of values ??goes on TV can not do politics and business. Today in the global list of richest people increasingly those involved in the entertainment business. They are overtaking kings - metallurgy, processing, etc.. I support the diversification of business, with a broad view not only forward but also in the sides. In this context, and should consider buying a package of "1 +1".

- So, are you ready to pay 100 million for 40 percent of "1 +1"?

- Yes, we will do it.

- But after a year in the "pros" license expires. Are not you afraid that by making undesirable for power purchase, you risk losing money along with the channel?

- Continuation of license "1 +1" - this was checked for integrity to government. While the channel has no comments. If the situation continues, then the license will be required to continue automatically. If the comments of the National Council for Television and Radio will be made (for example, as happened with the "New Channel"), we will submit to the contest and fight.

- How do you assess the real profitability of business in Ukraine? For any return you to tackle the project? For example, Akhmetov - 20 percent, and you?

- I do not remember the exact figures, but probably enough to say that last year "1 +1" earned 14 million dollars. And while maintaining the dynamics of growth this year will get 20. In 40 percent of the shares falls channel 8 million. In today's profit level is '12 return. But I do not doubt, nor that profitability will grow. And next year will bring $ 30 million. The dynamics is such that our costs can easily pay off within five years. Here you and 20 percent.

And a little sew at home ...

- Do you have production, oil business, bank, gas station network. Are not you going to adhere retail? Today many of these deals as beneficial. Do Dnipropetrovsk wholesale market "Ozerka" - that first step?

- As for our long-suffering "Ozerki" ... We never subject it is not engaged. But "before last" Governor Vladimir Azarov very zaturbuvavsya our "Ozerki". And most likely he was personally hostile to the director of market master Efimenko, by the way, veterans and disabled. So, against this hostile relationship and commercial order, which came from one of Moscow's structures Yatsuba this man cast into prison, kept there six months, where Efimenko lost 30 kg weight. I do not know whether it was "Ozerka" to be treated this way.

Dnepropetrovsk - our hometown and we decided to intervene in this matter. We gave signals in the presidential administration and regional administration in that competition to sell "Ozerki" prepared under the same buyer. Well, Nikopol, son of President, if wanted, the - twist. Well, "Krivorozhstal" - a strategic enterprise. Do not want it got to the Russians or Americans - hold a competition for Ukrainian businessmen. But "Ozerka" But here is what? What is the geopolitical situation is this market? So we were involved in this process. While no economic interest in us was not there, and there will not be.

- Is it true that you have purchased chervonenkivskyy "White"?

- I have not bought from Eugene Chervonenko "Orlando," but I know that the soft drink market and concluded such an agreement a company associated with the brand name "Biola" acquired in connection with the brand name "Eagle" and " Premiere. "

- But "Biola" - this is your company, its juices and drinks water all the East of Ukraine.

- I'm in "Biola" is a commercial interest, but I do not do this business, but it is only a passive investor.

- You bought a Russian metallurgical plant Alapayivskyy because you did not have NFZ?

- We bought Alapayivku that this is a good building site and we look like a promising place to build elektroferosplavnoho production.

- A project of the American stage today?

- In the stage of negotiation and decoration. For over a year we are engaged in negotiations to purchase the U.S. ferroalloy plant. There are objective difficulties: the plant - bankrupt, under the court.

- And finally the question: why you and the second hour on the telephone instead of having to record this interview with us in wording or in your office?

- Unfortunately, earlier in October to do it in live mode will not work because I suffer from allergies to ambrosia. I understand allergies. In the flowering plants of this ill-fated I always leaving Ukraine.

- That is the only reason why you can not enter Ukraine, and no arrests and detentions are you not afraid?

- I think there is such a perspective. But all this I promised Mr. Grigorishin and I do not exclude that this could happen at any moment. He said an influential person in Ukraine.

- And you come in wearing pants without back pockets, and you go nobody puts a gun and drugs do not toss.

- I think that when the struggle intensifies further, the question is not in the pockets and not into drugs. As I was warned by my friend Poroshenko: "At him here so much is that it is better to let Kolomoyskyi sells all that in Ukraine, and goes to Indonesia." I have only one did not understand - why Indonesia?

- You say you want to remove the film and fly into space. Why has not realized a dream?

- No, the space would Bogolyubov, and I wanted to make a film like "Once in America," but the money spent "eight series" works. What life is and cinema.

----
-> Created for Igor Kolomoyskyy, Ihor Kolomoyskyi

In razhar Oranzhevoy Revolution in hall of one of Dnipropetrovsk telekanalov, prynadlezhaschyh the group "Privat" installed svobodnыy microphone, When dat all for wishing vыskazatsya at events in the country.

Sluchayno in the same day in the office channel arrived sovladelets "Privatbank" IhorKolomoyskyy. Exit from the Cabinet of the Director, on a bit does not hit the field of view cameras and decided podozhdat, until zakonchytsya involves speech ocherednoho resident of the city, ahytyrovavsheho against Viktor Yushchenko. "Эty oranzhevыe vorы same, as and all ostalnыe - Look at their machines!" - Cried out in a healthy cell detyna.

Olyharh Long slushal obvynenyya addresses in orange, as sweat rolled povernulsya stoyavshemu number of second and dryly added: "After all the truth And say all they are odynakovы. Tretyakov and Poroshenko nebos not razъezzhayut trams."

Nevertheless, that's already the fourth hour IhorKolomoyskyy schytaetsya unchanged sponsor of the orange camp of Ukrainian politicians. Not ymeya sobstvennoy polytycheskoy party, Kolomoyskyy okazыvaet on ukraynskuyu Policy Impact, sopostavymoe stepenyu social impact of the main sponsor of the Party of Regions Rinat Akhmetov.

IhorKolomoyskyy could rightfully considered an samыm zakrыtыm olyharhom in Ukraine. Scraped a huge state of, on the very nazhyl reputatsyyu odyoznoho, zhestkoho tsynychnoho and businessmen of the country.

In obыdennoho resident his name on assotsyyruetsya with something pleasing, except prozrachnoy strukturы property, kotoroy hvastaetsya sovladelets SCM. Chasche Total starsheho partner group Privat nazыvayut raider, thief, and almost has never Schuler - businessman.

This is mnohochasovoe interview "Ukrainian Truth" Actually zapysыvala in heart Privat group - in the office of the company "Sentosa" - one of the founder and pervonachalnыh nыneshnyh uchredyteley "Privatbank". In a large hall with two tables and bylyardnыmy akvaryumom throughout Stan nevыsokoho growth olyharh zashel in jeans and svytere.

O Politics

- You Chill olyharhom themselves?

- No.

- Why? You There Impact on policy, and in doing so, do you yavlyaetes businessman.

- In Me vesma ohranychennoe Impact on policy - Maybe, more than the desire vlyyat, something of opportunities realyzovыvat эty desire.

- Something for you to politics?

- Yhra. At least some kind this is popыtka bыt chestnыm same before him - When to say that I popыtalsya sdelat order vydet When such a society, as I myself represent ego.

- Kakym dolzhno bыt society in the presentation of Vashem?

- Spravedlyvыm.

- That is, you sotsyalyst?

- I think that I do not sotsyalyst, but somewhere more than the social-democrat. (Smeetsya)

- You would dovolnы although one man, Kotor You typed in or supported the policy?

- I CAN say that I-CEM is allowed to, after I nykoho in policy is not injected.

- What are the political forces in Ukraine You will never podderzhyvaly?

- Communists and sotsyalystov.

- A Yulyyu Tymoshenko?

- Podderzhyval morally.

- Only morally?

- Yes, Rather morally materyalno something. Is it possible, it has been cocoa materyalnaya YTB aid on the ground. Our businesses that are on the territory of the Lviv nahodyatsya or Ivano-Frankivsk region, not ysklyuchayu, vpolne could cooperate with mestnыmy cell BYT.

- But your guys Andrei Portnov and Stanislav Oleynik were held on the list of Yulia Tymoshenko in Verkhovna Rada!

- Yes, but I CAN say that they are Our guys. So, that wrote about our vzaymootnoshenyyah Portnow, very k ystyne relatives.

I'm with him periodic obschayus, obmenyvayus view, konsultyruyus. But work in understanding the volume, as we worked as with him, when in thy advokatskyy him was a business, no.

And I Oleynik at all long not seen and not heard of. In fact, with 2006 we did not We lead with his work.

- Party of Regions You podderzhyvaly?

- Never.

- A personally Viktor Yanukovych?

- When bыly prezydentskye election of 2004, CU-business voluntarily prynudytelno podderzhyval Yanukovych.

- And Viktor Yushchenko?

- Then the we have been able podderzhat not Yushchenko, but now we his moral podderzhyvaem on everything 100 percent.

- How much do you spent on Oranzhevuyu Revolution?

- "Privat" not at all bear nykakyh costs, and everyone from the shareholders, I think vыdelyal svoy funds that ynыe or restructuring. I personally spent to support the Revolution to five million dollars.

- Because of who эty money held?

- We have several channels it was, starting with Brodskoho. Today has not yet been time have come nazыvat their names.

- How much does the "Our Ukraine" people oriented you?

- I Chill at all, that there is no people oriented to "Private" or to me personally.

- As well as Ihorrod?

- Ego can be called on oryentyrovannыm "Ukrneft."

- But do you stick with the same nahodytes in straight pin, right?

- Yes, of course. I believe that Ihorrod today can be called klassycheskym lobbystom at all ... And I do not Chill, that someone is at all today could okazыvat Effect of "Our Ukraine".

Maybe, thanks to the fact that this is not so in numbers of Bolshaya structure. NUNS - a conglomerate of various in political forces. Kazhdaya of them quite ydeolohyzyrovana, tuda sostoyavshyesya composed of people with names that are not to be razmenyvat themselves or to support the Lobbying chyh something chastnыh interests. Topics more than, if this is zachastuyu will ydty against their conscience.

-> Created for Igor Kolomoyskyy, Ihor Kolomoyskyi

- A Baloga? You ego podderzhyvaete Finance?

- Finance of - no.

- And his new project?

- He has not yet Advertised. I only heard of, that came out on from the "Our Ukraine".

- Baloga you personally about it rasskazыval?

- We are with him obsuzhdaly podobnыe development versions of events. We talked about Volume, that have come during a obrazovatsya some kind Novaya polytycheskoy units. But I do not pochuvstvoval, there is something in Baloga hlubokaya vera in podobnыy project and in it, that actually create the ego in ohranychennыe vremennыe Deadline.

- This is obsuzhdalos you with Balohoy in the financing of the project?

- No. This is just obsuzhdalos during a lunch tovaryscheskoho, congratulations Happy birthday.

- As far as pravdyvы DATA, that one time You were ready to finance "season"?

- We even bыly talks with "Sometimes" on kotorыh I was a, Korban, Filatov (yurystы-partners "Inside") and someone from the "Porы", I think that Kaskyv.

Shla a question about assistance in funding "Porы" in 2006, and Boris Filatov whether it wanted to list ydty "Porы", then whether this is predlahaly emu. But sweat is not a how-sroslos.

- True, that You vыdvyhaete requirements for in political projects that are will maintain an - When there was no people there Pinchuk?

- If we talk about people Pinchuk, the Tell this story. How, then in 2006 we held a conversation with the hostess Kreynynыm - On Then the relatives was a housewife Lytvyn: ego was a sыn zhenat on dochery Lytvyn. And a question about zashla support of the People's Party.

We are told that we in the People's Party allerhycheskuyu reaction vыzыvayut several famylyy. Pervaya - a hostess Eremeev, Kotor upon it was vыhnat rescind from the block. We are with him bыly Then the not very teplыh relations. Our divorce was a process of Drohobыchskom neftepererabatыvayuschem plant on uhodyl with businesses, we visited.

And second - we heard of, that the list Lytvyn talking hospozha Chebotarev (at a time - one of the leaders of "Interpipe"). In that we said, "If Only Chebotarev ysklyuchat from the list, We can obsuzhdat CEI question." But this is it was stated in the form of jokes. Is it possible, after do this, and send rumors about nashem maintain an nezhelanyy projects, there are people in kotorыh Pinchuk.

- You podderzhyvaly "Our Ukraine" during a obeyh yzbyratelnыh campaigns - and 2006, and 2007 hodov?

- Podderzhyval. And we in no more than the not pomohaly. Razve Brodskomu in that of the last Campaign.

- Zachem? You also know that this is neprohodnoy project?

- Brodskyy we asked about assistance. And we are even bigger in his power for his money podderzhyvaly. (Smeetsya.) Brodskyy mainly with himself spravylsya эtoy task and all profynansyroval Campaign individually, and we bыly on podstrahovke.

- Vaux how much the group "Privat" oboshlas proshlaya Election Campaign?

- We must immediately put the point over the "i", later that this is all - My Personal My Personal projects and the game in politics.

- But эta your support of parties and blocs to vlyyaet Sharing business "Inside"!

- This could vlyyat Sharing in business, but could not vlyyat and Ved. Can vlyyat about negative, can positively ...

Let Martыnov altogether deeply apolytychnыy people. A Bogolyubov yavlyaetsya katehorycheskym opposed participation in polytycheskoy life. Therefore, my tech support or ynыh politicians not ymeet total k-business relations.

- Then the tell how much you personally PA oboshlys electoral Campaign in 2006 and 2007 hodov?

- Me personally Two Campaign oboshlys million to $ 40.

- That is, you have spent in the eight times bigger, something to Oranzhevuyu Revolution ...

- Yes. We shed no money for the When to earn.

- And for cheho? Poveselytsya?

- A me comrades from Moscow told the reaction Berezovsky on the image to TVs during a Oranzhevoy Revolution. When obsuzhdal on the question, how much money spent, then such Berezovsky alleged sounding phrase: "Yes, 40 million, of course, a pity, but zato massovka cocoa." (Smeetsya)

- You have the same oschuschenyya?

- No, to me not so oschuschenyya. Delhi that Berezovsky lives in London, and his Ukraine could volnovat bit bigger, something Georgia. Or maybe, and less.

- You with Berezovsky obschaetes?

- I am with him not even sign. Vydel once in his life in 1999 year on Kuchma's inauguration. On proletel past, vokruh him was a halo svytы, it wanted with him pozdorovatsya ... Well, I sides for co эtym Everyone posmotrel. And so - not ymel honor the submitted bыt.

- Do you have a unykalnыy else was a project - a Selyanskaya batch in the elections of 2006. There, in the electoral list bыly Martыnov and rod. Tell, as their uhorazdylo?

- This project voznyk purpose. (Smeetsya.) As far as I know, we Martыnov uvlekaetsya vertoletnыm and avya-sports, and on эtoy baze in him there is Miscellaneous friends. And one of them,, I think that okazalsya эtoy party leader, he vtyanul Martыnova in CEI project, recorded in his Five. Maybe by then-kakym zastolem rod and they are invited to "tepluyu company". But there I spent one kopeyky us, they are rashodovaly svoy Personal funds. (Smeetsya.)

- Let's talk about legends vokruh Kolomoyskoho. The phrase "upon lohov throw" - vasheho authorship?

- No, not at all of my. I am the way, rolled the word "lohy" very bad otnoshus Chill and that this is not very dostoynoe word.

If the word "Loch" Usually in understanding the landed nazыvat consumers, people obыvateley, then in my understanding the word "Loch" assotsyyruetsya with people, Kotor upon obmanыvat, or throw something kakym image vыtyahyvat him from the ego sberezhenyya.

Therefore I am not very good otnoshus k word "Loch", Ved aferyzm Fraud and me not very sympatychnы.

- The second koronnaya phrase kotoruyu prypysыvayut you - "I do not cry no taxes and debts Returns."

- A Legend hostess Vыdryna.

Evidently, when on svoy opusы writes, he loves vыpyt a bottle of brandy. Then the Here, apparently, is this emu and dreamed of walking drunk.

He has repeatedly personally before mnoy yzvynyalsya. I emu say: "Personally do not need, you publicly. After that You vezde been printed, and you эtoy phrases such not heard of me. This is alleged here you gave me, and I'm so podozrevayu that this is sdelal Brodskyy."

- Cam yavlyaetsya Brodskyy for you? Partner Svyaznoj on spetsporuchenyyam?

- On our old comrades, the familiar, buddy. Even bigger, something comrades. We are familiar with him with the end of 1996-beginning 1997 year, bыly with his partners in "Kiev Vedomosti".

People stanovyatsya friends, when they are with the second man of quite pleasant Minutes were held, have spent pleasant days of, has received something What are polozhytelnыe эmotsyy. And with our tovaryschestvo Brodskym began with the fact that we received the otrytsatelnыe эmotsyy.

We are with him hlebnuly nastolko lot of grief, that without him in the future no longer could. (Smeetsya)

O Media, 1 1 I "Ukrneft"

- You now Kakymy Media vladeete or kontrolyruete?

- I know that my friend Gennady Bogolyubov obschaetsya Lozhkynыm s mistress, they teplыe relations, and Lozhkyn vedet something What are joint projects - a magazine "Focus" and "Komsomolskaya Pravda".

- How delyatsya they Fractions?

- I think not ynache as a 50 to 50. Less than 50% something Bogolyubov Never would not sohlasylsya.

And I, as you know, yavlyayus Tretyakov partner in "Glavred" Kotor prynadlezhyt UNIAN, "Profiles," What are something else edition. Upravlyayuschym partner there yavlyaetsya Tretyakov. But, In addition, in heroycheskaya else I have a story with "1 +1".

- Tell your version of - as it was with all pokupkoy "1 +1" and something more zakonchylos?

- I would wanted Snooze Story for a while. Today company is located in the CME condition sdelky s Fuksman and Rodnyanskym. I as a council member of the CME director know that there is a contract of Privacy Statement, and I do not, I would like povredyt эtoy sdelke. When all zavershytsya, and side vыydut from the buying and selling process, while the can will talk about it.

- How do you realyzovaly themselves as a curator of the "1 +1" in CME? Not long ago, your partner Gennady Korban said that responding for You ukraynskuyu portion Enterprises CME.

- I do not yavlyayus curator of Ukrainian part Enterprises CME. This is Korban so it seems, Maybe, emu so hotelos would. But Korban, unfortunately rolled or happiness, not yavlyaetsya aktsyonerom us, us upravlentsem company CME. Therefore, online affairs do not know, say soft ...

Company CME built so that there is no such council curator of directors kakymy something countries. There are council directors, he is engaged in all for the question, including, and Ukraine. And there is neposredstvennыe managers that are Responsible for Ukraine.

- You in the assembly was attended by council directors CME?

- So far no else had me. Neither time. I hope to soon go to assembly directors of CME, kotoroe dolzhno sostoyatsya in Buhareste.

- What are You would im porekomendovaly shahy on the Ukrainian market?

- Only one - pobыstree complete vzaymootnoshenyya s Fuksman and Rodnyanskym.

- True, You bought that channel TET?

- Half of the property. Zashel, but has not yet been arranged. But with Surkis already dohovorylsya. We are also friends with them on neschastyu in the "plus".

- A defunct Surkysы ymeyut relations k "1 +1"?

- And they are in the "plus" the same postradavshye, how and we, too, paid for the shares Rodnyanskomu. Delhi that simultaneously co mnoy svoymy money paid and Surkis.

- What is this novost? As is now well and Surkis Rodnyanskyy will be rashodytsya?

- They have all razrulyly. Previously Surkysы clean up your part in history эtoy not afyshyrovaly. It was a Sharing our project with them.

-> Site for Ihor Kolomoyskyi, Igor Kolomoyskyy

- And do you now along with Surkis vladeete 3% of CME?

- No, separately. With shares of CME svoymy I paid money. A When we razberemsya Quantity whole of the situation, will receive thy Surkysы ynteres, or shares of CME, or money. But among the owners of the "1 +1" s will not.

- Who predpolahalsya the role of head of channel TET from your band?

- AS genprodyusera we pryhlashaly Savyka Schuster. His task it was kuryrovat channel with a view podnyatyya rating. First to Live with эntuzyazmom vzyalsya and sweat, when send him in affairs with "Inter", emu was nedosuh.

- Incidentally, when you began a Fuksman and a conflict with Rodnyanskym, "Ukrainian Truth" arendovala office in the house on sosedstvu s kvartyroy Rodnyanskoho. And in connection with the topics that you nachalys trenyya in Rodnyanskoho usylylas Ocran, she constantly tsyrkulyrovala in the courtyard, proveryala Attic, podvalы. Why you people boyatsya?

- There are two obъyasnenyya. FIRST - maybe they are indeed opasayutsya and boyatsya. And another version - this Ocran Rodnyanskoho just wants to earn money dopolnytelnыe, so the nakruchyvaet lyshnyuyu work is pokazыvaet its importance and the need.

- But it is impossible demonyzyrovat same man with zero. Something zastavlyaet same people to guarding service in the event of conflict with Kolomoyskym?

- This is "something" and zastavlyaet me borrow guarding service in the event of conflict with someone.

- With whom? The last defunct a conflict forced you to take guarding service?

- I took EE else in 1998 year.

- Because of the conflict with Lazarenko?

- We have there was no conflict with Lazarenko. Then the has been such an nespokoynaya The total situation.

- What you famous at talks on alleged slyyanyyu "Inter" and CME?

- Volume at me famous, that negotiations were conducted co polovynы second of 2007, but zakonchylys nychem. Position of the parties at the time of Thoth bыly nastolko away from each other, that culminated in talks immediately.

- As far as sootvetstvuet reality, that portion aktyvov "Inter" over a control pod Dmitry Firtash?

- Volume O, that portion aktyvov "Inter" over a Firtash, rumors have long gone. Also went to rumors about Volume, that portion aktyvov rolled over a mistress Haiduk and packaging. Personally I nykakyh documents not seen, but bigger sklonyayus K versions with Firtash. That is, if someone here Horoshkovsky something passed and then, perhaps, over k Firtash, something rolled Haiduk and packaging.

- A nыneshnyaya reklamnaya Media-War has been IMPLICATIONS otkaza here sdelky slyyanyya 1 +1 and "Inter"?

- War has started Reklamnaya else before, as nachalys negotiations, ie the spring of last year. At the beginning of war povlyyalo vhozhdenye channels Pinchuk obschuyu in the program with "Inter" in advertising. In connection with эtym voznykly not sovsem rыnochnыe terms that are pozvolyaly otzhymat "1 +1" and others feeds on the advertising market.

- When zavershytsya sdelka 1 between a CME and Rodnyanskym, you'll hlavnыm curator Enterprises in 1 +1 in Ukraine?

- I think that is not. There Marina Williams in CME. Today Ukraynoy is engaged in a new rumыnskyy manager. We are, say, c We lead Lauder Standing advice kasatelno Ukraine. In The last time we vstrechalys on Saturday evening, uzhynaly in London. Ego ynteresovalo that the tvorytsya in Ukraine, Where we dvyzhemsya, as the political situation? What proyshodyt with Tymoshenko?

- And how, you udovletvoryly lyubopыtstvo ego?

- I said that Tymoshenko in its work nemnozhko withdrew beyond, with one side, koalytsyonnыh of agreements, and with Another side - meaning of sensible.

- When You in The last time vydelys with Tymoshenko?

- At the end of December. I was asked to organize the help the rod a meeting, wanted to wake pobesedovat neftehazovom situation on the market, When nobility kakyh syurpryzov us wait. We vstrechalys in nee in the Cabinet. They said be about hours. I came out with uverennostyu, that everything is in order, that will be Normal rыnochnыe terms. She vstrechala me with a smile, with a smile provozhala.

- Let the order, she withdrew into something beyond koalytsyonnoho agreement?

- For example, in the framework agreement koalytsyonnoho Cabinet dolzhen was a rыnochnыy develop a mechanism for acquisition of gas on the Ukrainian market con depending on the origin ego - of Russian or Ukrainian, and develop a parallel system lhot, grants and subsidies for bednыh layers of the population. But now with proyzoshedshee "Ukrneftyu" talk about volume, that CEI para proyhnoryrovan agreement.

-> Site for Ihor Kolomoyskyi, Igor Kolomoyskyy

- Here, perhaps, you said the sobstvennыy ynteres?

- The man They say everybody sobstvennыe interests. I today yavlyayus krupnыm aktsyonerom "Ukrneft." And to clean up your time when podpysыvalos koalytsyonnoe agreement, stick me talk, that there Clear written: gas con depending on the order where online dobыt, dolzhen prodavatsya on rыnochnыm prices. But for today we received the Another result - Natskomyssyyya Electricity Regulatory predpysala "Ukrneft" otdavat gas instead of $ 60 to 40 - with a market value of 180 dollars for thousand cubic meters.

- How do you otreahyrovaly the words Tymoshenko at volume, that "Ukrneftyu" rukovodyat avantyurystы?

- We are about negative extreme of this is proreahyrovaly.

Incidentally, when Yulia Tymoshenko said the patron of the group "Privat" in hosudarstvennыh structures, I would be wanted, When she is not zabыvala prychyslyat k s and the number itself.

After that ymenno Tymoshenko praised us for assistance in return of 18% "Ukrtatnefty" State and nastoyatelno rekomendovala again by 38% in the remaining Tatars. A director "Ukrtatnefty" Ovcharenko, Kotor now she wants smestyt, she nazыvala "samыm opыtnыm manager of the large enterprises."

- But too hnev Tymoshenko in nekotoroy degree justified. For example, The State ymeet kontrolnыy package and "Ukrtatnefty" and "Ukrneft", but could not put clean up your company guidance ...

- Why could not? Tymoshenko said that alleged in the "Ukrneft" two years is not held assembly of shareholders. So hey we otpravyly letter from shareholders in which you wrote, when The last time was carried out assembly. This is clearly it was closer, something two years ago.

The State is represented in the Supervisory Sauve "Ukrneft" - from the 11 members tuda six naznachenы quotas on "Naftogaz". That is, she ymeet bolshynstvo in Supervisory Sauve.

- But she wants to control the management of Current "Ukrneft"!

- A Cabinet is yavlyaetsya aktsyonerom that the company, aktsyonerom yavlyaetsya "Naftogaz". And upon Getting Compare the results and activities, when "Ukrneftyu" managed "Naftogaz 's results, when in 2003 year tuda pryshel Ihorrod.

- Cutting the secret, as you constantly udaetsya uhovoryvat state representatives ostavyt your guidance "Ukrneft"?

- We pыtalys ubedyt "Naftogaz" set of our Over the director, perhaps, three years - from 2000 to 2002. And Finally we ubedyly. After that in 2003 year has been perehodnaya a situation was a market for nestabylen, Inc. pokazыvala not very Good the results, was a kredytorky growth, growth debetorky, bыly problem with gas.

In the phase of volume we were able ubedyt Yuriy Boyko, who was a leader of Then the "Naftogaz". Then the im it was something engage - hazovыmy New Delhi, a consortium, but a real "Ukrneft" has been beshoznaya.

-> Site for Ihor Kolomoyskyi, Igor Kolomoyskyy

- And you gave bezvozmezdno EE?

- Were uplachenы this is time for all taxes, has been shown ohromnaya profit. For When EE show, it was upon EE and earn sakkumulyrovat. And, except taxes, bыly uplachenы dyvydendы states and all for aktsyoneram. C 2003 to 2007 hours it was uplacheno dyvydendov two and a half billion USD!

- Many confident that the situation with the leadership "Ukrneftyu" could not obъyasnyatsya ynache corruption as a social side "Inside" ...

- We zhyvem in Ukraine. And when the delayut korruptsyonnosty ratings, we, unfortunately, to the position of nahodymsya who do not sootvetstvuyut possibility of our country.

- You or your managers korrumpyrovaly of officials?

- No, we will never korrumpyrovaly of officials, in particular, Boyko.

- Well, well, and if would korrumpyrovaly, you would admit?

- (Smeetsya.) Everything depends on the relationships with our Boiko, as they are with us more than, less than Good. But I want to ask Another question: Does yavlyaetsya uplata dyvydendov, completely of all taxes and raising payments to the budget corruption? Here "Naftogaz" gets with us and could dyvydendы with them to do everything that considers the proper guy. If necessary on their could send in something What are the island.

Types, there is very tonkaya line between corruption and public interest. After that state-owned ynteres in volume When taxes get bigger. A "Ukrneft" zarabatыvaya profit, almost did not pay taxes, but with our arrival was paid in two, three or five times more. And now the question: is this corruption to the state? If Ono put the private, but effectively became the director and get more than the money.

- It is true that this is your phrase, "a tool to fight corruption yavlyaetsya with bureaucracy"?

- I think that is not mine. I Apply Natalia EE, but I do not yavlyayus EE ancestor. I EE is not invented.

- You sohlasnы with it?

- The phase of kakom something, yes. If inflation at some least yavlyaetsya engines of the economy, and hyperynflyatsyya yavlyaetsya EE razrushytelem, the corruption, Maybe, and yavlyaetsya on kakom something phase of borboy with bureaucracy, but in the outcome suggestive k else bigger and more than terrible bureaucracy.

O Yushchenko, Akhmetov and Tymoshenko

- Here You say that podderzhyvaly Revolution 2004, In doing so, do you podderzhyvaly Tymoshenko, Yanukovych podderzhyvaly.

- Yes, I am allowed to topics that happened in the country after the revolution, as it razvyvaetsya. Maybe not rate topics and not in the form of volume, as would hotelos topics, someone stood on the Maidan. I did not stand there. Maybe people wanted bolsheho, delay bыly zavыshenы.

But if we vozmem today Ukrainian "Forbes" under the name "Focus", then we ever see, that there from the year in h. The number of millionaires uvelychyvaetsya. We once wrote in The last 130 famylyy. And how much is written? I bыvayu and in Dnepropetrovsk, and in Kiev, and in Western Ukraine, I see, as razvyvaetsya society.

If we pыtaemsya build the economy of Ukraine on snare sample, then, in general, we vыstrayvaem society consumption. So that's, osnovnoy indicator of society potreblenyya - potreblenyya post index - in the country is growing.

- In future presidential elections You will maintain an Yushchenko?

- Yes.

- The Advantages of something Yushchenko and Tymoshenko to Yanukovych? You pragmatic businessman. You dolzhen nravytsya zhestkyy head.

- Vice versa. I otnoshus k is the type of businessmen that are ponymayut that the Economy topics operates better, something less EE trohayut hands. Replace less neutral prykasayutsya k, are trying something less eyu ahead, the more she funktsyonyruet better.

A Function of State dolzhna zaklyuchatsya only in rehulyruyuschyh Function, When no one zloupotreblyal theme opportunities that are daet rыnochnaya economy, not sostavlyal cartel, not narushal antymonopolnoe legislation.

- You have to face the group "Privat" stop the choice on how to Yushchenko The most soft, loyal to you and K The most flabby in the management of the state.

-> Site for Ihor Kolomoyskyi, Igor Kolomoyskyy

- I CAN say that Yushchenko is very loyal to us k otnosytsya. If we recall 2005 year history and vokruh Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant, he said that "a gang of pыtalys pomenyat druhuyu gang."

- For all time is this has been Edinstvennaya, and then nepryamaya, criticism in your address social side said. Look, how many online krytykuet Party of Regions and of all ostalnыh!

- Da Party of Regions - a business-structure, which will be presented and the party, and faction, and business-circles!

I do not even know us one of the country in the world, where vozmozhen such a conglomerate, as a Party of Regions! This is some kind symbyoz between SCM, Party of Regions, Ukrpodshypnykom, Konti ... So whether they batch, whether it is faction, then whether council directors.

Even in Russia such there. Although there Quantity faction "United Russia" included more than 300 people, but no such When sydelo 100 Man from "RUSAL", and 100 Man - that "Norilsk nickel". Such they are even present themselves not Submissions may be. And we have this is possible. Another such a country I do not know. (Smeetsya)

- Why you do not vыskazыvaete Such Rinat Akhmetov the claim at a meeting lychnoy?

- I vыskazыvayu. I'm with him ymel happiness get acquainted in 2003 year, and Since then, everyone talking about it again.

- And on that?

- And on smeetsya.

- Where do you poznakomylys?

- In the Cabinet in Gregory Surkis. I was a svoym in New Delhi, and Rinat Leonidovich zashel on svoym.

We Then the nahodylys in konflykte vokruh Central mountain-obohatytelnoho plant. We poznakomyl Gregory M.. Said: "By the way I speak, that's IhorValerevych, and that's Rinat Leonidovich, poznakomtes." We withheld each other hands and razoshlys.

- The central outcome in GOK has been at the hands of Akhmetov.

- Once okazalsya, mean, on the right.

- And all the same, why you bigger nravytsya Yushchenko, Yanukovych and Tymoshenko something? If the president will be, say, Tymoshenko, where do you themselves in such a case, visible?

- If the president will Tymoshenko, I vyzhu themselves in эmyhratsyy.

- Venue podobraly already?

- I podberu - else there is in me time. (Smeetsya.) Although, as know, if you realyzuetsya quickly, now is engaged in something BYuT and Party of Regions - the elimination of the post of president and dvuhpartyynaya dictatorship - that of time could okazatsya namnoho less, something I myself represent.

----

IhorKolomoyskyi - supervisory board member and co-owner of the group "Privat"

42 years, married, two children

Scope of activities: finance, oil and gas, ferroalloys

Political scientist Dmitry Vydrin Ukrainian businessman IhorKolomoyskyi managed to surprise at least twice. The first time Vydrin visited Dnepropetrovsk office multimillionaire.

One of the walls of his cabinet held a huge aquarium with exotic waterfowl. On the coffee table console with buttons 1 - pieces of lobsters, 2 - tiger prawns, etc. Clicking on one of them, Vydrin personally convinced that the aquarium is really showered huge shrimp.

The second time Kolomoyskyi struck the capital's political scientist recently. One close friend Vydrin borrowed money from him to buy an apartment. Instead of returning cash to spin doctor friend rewrote debt held by the court to reimburse him one of the structures of privatization. "I took advantage of the fact that personally acquainted with IhorValeryevich, we have a mutual friend - says Vydrin - through him I delivered papers, confirming the debt, asking in a friendly way to pay me."

In response Kolomoyskoho you received through an intermediary Vydrin, on it ran until the ant "With all due respect and sympathy, I can not repay because my principle is that I did not cry taxes and debts not return", - quotes words Vydrin Kolomoysoho.

-> Site for Ihor Kolomoyskyi, IhorKolomoyskyy

Not the fact that these words be taken seriously. Political analyst Kost Bondarenko says Kolomoyskyi - a great joker, with a Jewish sense of humor. However Vydrin still not funny. He has more than two months unsuccessfully trying to contact their non-poor debtor.

In addition to these questionable principles billionaire, billionaire still has a few strange whims. First, Kolomoyskyy one of the few oligarchs, who managed to politely evade all voluntary-coercive patronage of President of Ukraine projects.

Second, the informal leader Privat not managed to get to the annual ranking of the richest people in the world of American magazine Forbes. For Kolomoyskoho straschenno is unfair.

Since independence, Dnipropetrovsk businessman has built one of the largest business empires of the country. Under his control - metallurgical and ferroalloy plants, it has a monopoly on the Ukrainian market of manganese ore. In the asset packages of five ore-bearing plants and one of the largest banks in the country. He is metaloferosplavne production in Russia and Romania. Owner of FC Dnipro (Dnipropetrovsk) utomlyuyetsya not compete for new fatty chunks of the national economy. Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant - one of them.

This Bondarenko admires courage Kolomoyskoho that is not afraid to conflict with stronger competitors. As an example, cites opposition group Private with the "Donetsk", when they were still in power.

The essence of the aggressive behavior pryvativtsiv in domestic and foreign market Bondarenko illustrated anecdote about Wolf and Little Red Riding Hood, where the role of gray took Kolomoyskyi and business partners - defenseless girl "caught Wolf Little Red Riding Hood, and said to her, now you have two options - either merge or acquisitions. "